ARCTIC Xtender VG vs Mechanic Master C24 Sweet Cube Classic
A side-by-side spec comparison of the ARCTIC Xtender VG and the Mechanic Master C24 Sweet Cube Classic. We line up every specification and score the ones that matter most in this category — weighted, not a raw count of specs won — to reach an overall verdict so you can decide which case is right for your build.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Fans | {"included":2,"maxTotal":6} | {"included":2,"maxTotal":6} |
| Type | ATX Mid Tower | Mini ITX Tower |
| Drive Bays | {"2.5":2,"3.5":1} | {"2.5":2,"3.5":1} |
| Side Panel | Tempered Glass | Tempered Glass |
| Form Factor | ATX, Micro-ATX, Mini-ITX | Mini-ITX |
| Max GPU Length | 400 mm | 400 mm |
| Expansion Slots | 7 | 2 |
| Max Cooler Height | 170 mm | 170 mm |
| Psu Form Factor Support | ATX, SFX, SFX-L | - |
Too close to call — these products trade blows on the specs that matter.
ARCTIC Xtender VG
0
performance points
Mechanic Master C24 Sweet Cube Classic
0
performance points
Winner is scored by weighting the specs that matter most in this category (not a raw count of specs won).
As an Amazon Associate, PlanMyPC earns from qualifying purchases made through links on this page.
Compare more parts
Add a third or fourth case to this comparison, or build a side-by-side from scratch in the interactive compare tool.