Cooler Master Cosmos C700M vs Cooler Master HAF XB EVO
A side-by-side spec comparison of the Cooler Master Cosmos C700M and the Cooler Master HAF XB EVO. We line up every specification and score the ones that matter most in this category — weighted, not a raw count of specs won — to reach an overall verdict so you can decide which case is right for your build.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Fans | {"included":2,"maxTotal":6} | {"included":2,"maxTotal":6} |
| Type | ATX Full Tower | ATX Desktop |
| Drive Bays | {"2.5":2,"3.5":4} | {"2.5":2,"3.5":2} |
| Side Panel | Tempered Glass | Mesh |
| Form Factor | E-ATX, ATX, Micro-ATX, Mini-ITX | ATX, Micro-ATX, Mini-ITX |
| Max GPU Length | 400 mm | 400 mm |
| Expansion Slots | 7 | 7 |
| Max Cooler Height | 170 mm | 170 mm |
| Psu Form Factor Support | ATX, SFX, SFX-L | ATX, SFX, SFX-L |
Too close to call — these products trade blows on the specs that matter.
Cooler Master Cosmos C700M
0
performance points
Cooler Master HAF XB EVO
0
performance points
Winner is scored by weighting the specs that matter most in this category (not a raw count of specs won).
Compare more parts
Add a third or fourth case to this comparison, or build a side-by-side from scratch in the interactive compare tool.